CPM S90V vs S110V: A Comprehensive Steel Comparison

The evolution of high-performance knife steels has led to remarkable advancements, with CPM S90V and S110V representing the pinnacle of wear-resistant stainless steels. Both developed by Crucible Industries, these steels offer exceptional edge retention and corrosion resistance, though with distinct characteristics that set them apart.

Chemical Composition and Structure

ElementCPM S90VCPM S110V
Carbon2.30%2.80%
Chromium14.00%15.25%
Vanadium9.00%9.00%
Molybdenum1.00%2.25%
Niobium3.00%
Cobalt2.50%

The key distinction lies in S110V’s addition of niobium and increased chromium content[4]. This modification results in approximately 25% greater volume of wear-resistant carbides, with 50% more of the highly desirable MC-type carbides[4]. The higher chromium content in S110V provides enhanced corrosion resistance compared to S90V[1].

Carbide Formation and Microstructure

S90V’s high vanadium content promotes the formation of hard vanadium carbides instead of chromium carbides, leaving more free chromium for corrosion resistance[1]. S110V builds upon this foundation with its niobium addition, which creates an even finer carbide structure:

  • S90V: ~21% carbide volume
  • S110V: ~27% carbide volume[5]

The niobium in S110V contributes to a finer overall carbide structure, which is remarkable given its higher total carbide volume[5]. This refinement in microstructure impacts several performance characteristics:

  • Better edge stability
  • Improved toughness despite higher carbide content
  • Enhanced corrosion resistance due to more free chromium[5]

Performance Metrics

Edge Retention
S90V demonstrates superior edge retention compared to most commercial steels, while S110V pushes these boundaries even further[2]. In CATRA testing, both steels consistently rank among the highest performers, with S90V showing slightly better results in some cases[8].

Corrosion Resistance

SteelRelative Rating (1-10)
S90V5
S110V6
440C4

S110V exhibits better corrosion resistance due to:

  • Higher chromium content (15.25% vs 14.00%)
  • More efficient carbide formation leaving additional free chromium
  • Enhanced molybdenum content[5]

Heat Treatment Parameters and Optimization

The heat treatment process significantly impacts the performance of both steels, with specific requirements for optimal results:

S90V Heat Treatment

  • Austenitizing temperature: 2050°F (1120°C)
  • Double tempering required at 400-750°F (200-400°C)
  • Minimum 2 hours per temper cycle[1]
  • Freezing treatment may be necessary between tempers to minimize retained austenite
  • Optimal hardness range: HRC 56-59[1]

S110V Heat Treatment

  • Higher austenitizing temperature: 2150°F (1175°C)
  • Triple tempering required with complete cooling between cycles
  • Tempering options:
  • 400-750°F (200-400°C) for maximum corrosion resistance
  • 975-1000°F (525-540°C) for peak hardness
  • 1025-1050°F (550-565°C) for stress relief[2]

Manufacturing Considerations

Both steels are produced through Crucible’s Particle Metallurgy (CPM) process, which results in several manufacturing implications:

Machinability and Grinding

  • S110V exhibits slightly more challenging machining characteristics compared to S90V
  • Both require specialized grinding equipment:
  • SG type alumina wheels recommended
  • CBN wheels provide optimal performance[2]
  • Higher wear on tooling during manufacturing
  • Increased production costs due to:
  • Extended machining time
  • More frequent tool replacement
  • Higher energy requirements for heat treatment

Size Changes During Heat Treatment
Both steels experience similar dimensional changes:

  • +0.03 to +0.05% size increase for fully martensitic structure
  • Retained austenite may reduce net growth[1][2]

Real-World Performance

Edge Stability
Surprisingly, testing has shown that S90V can outperform S110V in certain edge retention tests, despite S110V’s higher alloy content[3]. This unexpected result may be attributed to:

  • Carbide size and distribution differences
  • Optimal balance of vanadium carbides in S90V
  • More efficient chromium utilization in S90V’s matrix

Wear Resistance Comparison

PropertyS90VS110V
Total Carbide Volume21%27%
MC-type CarbidesBase+50%
Relative Wear Rating35/4040/45

Practical Applications and Use Cases

Kitchen Cutlery
S90V demonstrates better characteristics for culinary applications due to:

  • Superior edge stability in protein-rich environments
  • Better resistance to acidic food reactions
  • More predictable sharpening behavior
  • Lower tendency for microchipping during board contact

Outdoor and Hunting Applications
S110V excels in demanding outdoor scenarios:

  • Extended field use without maintenance
  • Superior wear resistance in abrasive environments
  • Enhanced resistance to natural elements
  • Better performance in high-humidity conditions

Sharpening Characteristics and Maintenance

S90V Sharpening Profile

  • Requires diamond or CBN abrasives
  • Recommended progression:
  • Initial bevel setting: 100-200 grit
  • Refinement: 400-600 grit
  • Final edge: 800-1200 grit
  • Average sharpening time: 15-20 minutes for full progression

S110V Sharpening Profile

  • Demands premium diamond stones
  • Extended sharpening sequence:
  • Initial bevel: 100-200 grit
  • Multiple intermediate steps required
  • Final polish: 1200-1500 grit
  • Average sharpening time: 25-30 minutes for full progression

Cost-Benefit Analysis

FactorS90VS110V
Raw Material Cost$$$$$$$$$
Processing CostHighVery High
Edge LongevityExcellentSuperior
Maintenance CostHighVery High
Overall ValueBetter for most usersSpecialized applications

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which steel holds an edge longer?
A: While S110V technically has higher wear resistance, real-world testing shows comparable edge retention between both steels, with S90V sometimes performing better in specific applications.

Q: Is the extra cost of S110V justified?
A: For most users, S90V provides the better value proposition. S110V’s advantages become apparent only in specialized applications requiring extreme wear resistance.

Q: Can these steels be sharpened without professional equipment?
A: Both steels require high-quality diamond stones for effective sharpening. Professional equipment is recommended but not mandatory for maintaining a working edge.

Q: How does corrosion resistance compare to conventional steels?
A: Both significantly outperform conventional stainless steels, with S110V having a slight edge due to higher chromium content and more efficient carbide formation.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The choice between S90V and S110V should be based on specific use cases:

Choose S90V for:

  • General high-performance applications
  • Better value proposition
  • Easier maintenance
  • Kitchen and food preparation
  • Better balance of properties

Choose S110V for:

  • Extreme wear resistance requirements
  • Professional outdoor applications
  • Applications where maintenance intervals must be maximized
  • Situations requiring maximum corrosion resistance

Citations:
[1] https://www.crucible.com/eselector/prodbyapp/plastics/s90vp.html
[2] https://tassietigerknives.com.au/steel-types/
[3] https://knifesteelnerds.com/2021/10/19/knife-steels-rated-by-a-metallurgist-toughness-edge-retention-and-corrosion-resistance/
[4] https://www.crucible.com/PDFs/DataSheets2010/Datasheet%20CPM%20S110Vv12010.pdf
[5] https://knifesteelnerds.com/2020/11/23/cpm-s110v-steel-history-and-properties/
[6] https://knifeup.com/cpm-s110v-steel/
[7] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cpm-s90v-steel-heat-treatment-hrc-60-62-cy-tan
[8] https://knifesteelnerds.com/2020/09/28/s90v-and-s125v-knife-steel-history-properties-and-how-to-heat-treat/
[9] https://knifeinformer.com/discovering-the-best-knife-steel/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *